Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: PIX Setup with PAT |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 30 Sep 2004 16:48:18 -0500 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 AFAIK, your default gateway must always lie on an IP network in which you have an interface. If you are a router, you've got interfaces in 2 (or more) networks. So the router default gateway points (usually) to the serial interface of the upstream ISP. This network is directly connected to the router. Your suggestion that the PIX be given the serial interface IP as a default gateway will *not* work because the PIX is not directly connected to that IP network. Now...as for creating an unnumbered IP network (only works on point-to-point links, as I recall - does the PIX even support this? Dunno that one.) between the PIX and the ethernet interface of the router, you would actually have *both* ethernet interfaces unnumbered. This seems overly complicated. Why not use a private IP on both the router ethernet interface and the PIX interface? Then you can put the public address on the PIX as a secondary and NAT/PAT through that. The default route is not the serial interface of the router, but the privately addressed ethernet interface of the same. This is not a problem (routers use private - meaning non-routed - interface addresses all the time) if you are doing only static routes and do not have to worry about route cache pollution from EIGRP or another routing protocol. You'll no longer be able to reach the ethernet interface of the router from the Internet, but the serial interface would still be available for off-site management (with a nice strong ACL on it, right?) if necessary. I've lost track of who originally asked this question, but if you e-mail me directly I'll be happy to provide an ASCII diagram of this method. Good luck! (B.) - ---------------------------------------- Bradley D. Moore, CNE, CCNA, CCDA Director of Network Services Technology Dynamics, LLC 8003 Castleway Drive, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46250 317-596-1226 (ph) 317-596-1229 (fx) bdmoore@techdyn.net http://www.techdyn.net - ---------------------------------------- Get PGP Freeware: http://web.mit.edu/network/pgp.html Get my PGP Public Key: http://mail1.techdyn.net/pgp/BDMoore.asc - ----------------------------------------
-----Original Message----- From: Jim Richards [ mailto:jrichards@meandaur.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 12:45 PM To: Andrew Shore; Anand Srivastava; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: PIX Setup with PAT Uh, that's what I was saying all along...remove the 1 IP from the ethernet interface on router and put it on the firewall which is using PAT on that 1 address. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Shore [ mailto:andrew.shore@holistecs.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 8:59 AM To: Jim Richards; Anand Srivastava; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: PIX Setup with PAT I still maintain that the easiest way to do this is to over load the external address and map individual ports through. This works perfectly for a number of our customers and it gives us secure access to the firewall (via ssh) over the internet to manage the box. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Richards [ mailto:jrichards@meandaur.com] Sent: 15 September 2004 14:18 To: Andrew Shore; Anand Srivastava; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: PIX Setup with PAT The way I understand the problem is there is only 1 useable public IP...if you remove that IP from the ethernet interface of the router by using IP unnumbered and use it on the outside interface of the PIX instead, you would then use the serial interface IP of the router as your default route for the PIX. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Shore [ mailto:andrew.shore@holistecs.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 3:00 AM To: Jim Richards; Anand Srivastava; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: PIX Setup with PAT The PIX has no serial interface, the serial interface is on the ISP router which also has an Ethernet interface. There is an Ethernet network between the router and PIX which is unnumbered? How can the PIX route to a gateway on a network it has no network on? You can only set a route to an interface for point to point links which Ethernet (by definition) can not be. Therefore, I don't understand how this can work. -----Original Message----- From: Jim Richards [ mailto:jrichards@meandaur.com] Sent: 14 September 2004 14:06 To: Andrew Shore; Anand Srivastava; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: PIX Setup with PAT You don't need an IP address for the ethernet interface - you point the default gateway of the pix to the IP of the serial interface. -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Shore [ mailto:andrew.shore@holistecs.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:24 AM To: Jim Richards; Anand Srivastava; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: PIX Setup with PAT This depends greatly on whether the IP supports IP unnumbered! Plus you then need an address on the Ethernet interface of the router to talk to the firewall interface -----Original Message----- From: Jim Richards [ mailto:jrichards@meandaur.com] Sent: 11 September 2004 02:53 To: Anand Srivastava; firewalls@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: PIX Setup with PAT Your best bet would be to use ip unnumbered on the router ethernet interface and put that public IP on the outside interface of the firewall. You can do this by entering the interface configuration and using this command: ip unnumbered serial0 (or whatever your wan interface is) -----Original Message----- From: Anand Srivastava [ mailto:anand.srivastava@global.com.pg] Sent: Fri 9/10/2004 1:23 AM To: firewalls@securityfocus.com Cc: Subject: PIX Setup with PAT Hi List, I have got a new PIX 515E and that needs to be setup in following way (pretty staright forward): Internet ------- Router ------ PIX ------ LAN | DMZ The problem is that we have only one Public IP assigned to router and we are using address translation for the clients on inside network. Is it worth running PIX (outside address) on private addressing scheme. Can someone give me an idea how to do that in the best possible way..? regards Anand
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use < http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBQVCNGUKqsbD0vWELEQLtEwCghRphPi1KedOl/5qvEnLp2TvVBS4AoO/7 RQOkpDYId7O8EwgziGnOptf2 =lh3W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Firewall Logs, Dave Killion |
|---|---|
| Previous by Thread: | RE: PIX Setup with PAT, Jim Richards |
| Next by Thread: | Difference between Nokia's VRRP and Checkpoint CLusterXL, SUBODH SHRIVASTAVA |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |