Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [UNIX] Apache Web Server htpasswd Predictable Salt Weakness |
|---|---|
| Date: | 15 Feb 2008 09:23:43 +0200 |
The following security advisory is sent to the securiteam mailing list, and can be found at the SecuriTeam web site: http://www.securiteam.com - - promotion The SecuriTeam alerts list - Free, Accurate, Independent. Get your security news from a reliable source. http://www.securiteam.com/mailinglist.html - - - - - - - - - Apache Web Server htpasswd Predictable Salt Weakness ------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUMMARY Apache web server supports three different algorithms for "encrypted" passwords for HTTP Basic authentication: - Unix-style crypt() passwords: uses a 12 bit salt (4096 possible values) and only the first 8 characters of the cleartext password are used - SHA hashes: no salt; any given password can have only one {SHA} representation - MD5 passwords: based on the BSD MD5 crypt routine, this provides for 48 bits of salt, for a theoretical 281 trillion (281,474,976,710,656) possible representations of any password Apache web server includes a command-line utility called 'htpasswd' for managing the files used for HTTP Basic authentication. It can be used (depending on the host OS) to create encrypted passwords with any of the supported algorithms. Apache's htpasswd utility uses a predictable sale which weakens considerable the protection provided for Apache's stored passwords, which in turn can be used to recover the passwords into their clear text form. DETAILS The htpasswd utility uses predictable salts for the salted algorithms (Unix-style "CRYPT" and MD5). htpasswd uses the standard C rand() function to generate "random" salts. In order to use rand(), htpasswd seeds the random number generator with the srand() function. And that's where the Apache developers made a critical mistake -- htpasswd merely uses the time of day (seconds since the Epoch, time(NULL)) to seed the random number generator. As a result: - Salts created by htpasswd are very predictable. - The universe of salts for htpasswd is far less than the MD5 algorithm provides for -- 29 bits vs. 48, or 0.000191 percent of the range that should be used for MD5. - Any passwords encrypted by htpasswd within the same second of system clock time will have the same salt, e.g. $ htpasswd -nbm user1 pass1; htpasswd -nbm user2 pass2; \ htpasswd -nbm user3 pass2 user1:$apr1$7jv93/..$2J9qu4mN2zms5O42vw/XE. user2:$apr1$7jv93/..$55cRqVaWTSB1YQpeD5uYe0 user3:$apr1$7jv93/..$55cRqVaWTSB1YQpeD5uYe0 All three users have the same salt, "7jv93/..", and user2 and user3 have the same encrypted password representation. Clearly, this is not good. Furthermore, as you can see in that example, and as Andreas Krennmair reported to the Apache Group in 2004, the htpasswd utility does not use the full 48 bits of salt for the MD5 algorithm -- the last two characters are always "..". So htpasswd tries creates 36-bit salt strings. Given that the srand() problem both reduces the universe to something like 29 bits[0] *and* makes the salt highly predictable, this 36-vs-48 distinction is a moot point -- as long as the srand() seeding is bad. The problem appears completely contained within the htpasswd utility; Apache web server handles all properly encrypted passwords as it should. Workarounds: 1) If you are concerned about the possibility of the vastly reduced salt space making your password tables vulnerable to pre-computed dictionary attacks, use an updated htpasswd utility to re-encrypt all MD5 or CRYPT passwords. 2) Use an alternate tool for generating your password hashes. Implementations of the CRYPT and "apr1" MD5 algorithms are available for various programming languages and platforms -- you don't need to use the inferior tool from the Apache project. Solution: htpasswd should at least use a more random seed for the srand() calls so that rand() can produce less predictable salts. It should also, as Andreas Krennmair noted, make full use of the 48-bit-wide salt capability of its "apr1" MD5 algorithm. Patches: Patches are available in Apache's "issues" database that correct both the weak seeding of srand() and, thanks to Andreas, the 36/48 bit salt size for MD5: <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31440> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31440 Here's sample output from a patched htpasswd utility: $ htpasswd -nbm user1 pass1; htpasswd -nbm user2 pass2; \ htpasswd -nbm user3 pass2 user1:$apr1$wMdual6C$4.JZNIEfbWvF7OKvpsTGO0 user2:$apr1$LCXYBrpM$6ypjd9FWcVjt6niwCHst71 user3:$apr1$7vefL1ic$6WdQmN9sMUQvQvMGVyHU// The patch Peter has submitted to the Apache group 1) By default makes use of the /dev/urandom device that is available on most modern open systems OSes 2) Allows the user to specify another seed source (such as /dev/random) via an environment variable 3) Prints a warning if it has to fall back to using time() Users of Microsoft Windows or other target platforms that lack /dev/urandom might want to improve on this approach with appropriate APIS such as RtlGenRandom on Windows. Also, the patch provides no updates to the htpasswd man page documentation. History: Vulnerability reported via vendor's bug tracking database, and source code patch made available, on 25 January 2008. Vendor security contact notified via email on 4 February 2008. Vendor response: None, as of 13 February 2008. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The information has been provided by <mailto:peterw@usa.net> Peter Watkins. The original article can be found at: <http://www.tux.org/~peterw/> http://www.tux.org/~peterw/ ======================================== This bulletin is sent to members of the SecuriTeam mailing list. To unsubscribe from the list, send mail with an empty subject line and body to: list-unsubscribe@securiteam.com In order to subscribe to the mailing list, simply forward this email to: list-subscribe@securiteam.com ==================== ==================== DISCLAIMER: The information in this bulletin is provided "AS IS" without warranty of any kind. In no event shall we be liable for any damages whatsoever including direct, indirect, incidental, consequential, loss of business profits or special damages.
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [NT] Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Office Publisher Allows Code Execution (MS08-012), SecuriTeam |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TOOL] w3af - Web Application Attack and Audit Framework, SecuriTeam |
| Previous by Thread: | [NT] Vulnerabilities in Microsoft Office Publisher Allows Code Execution (MS08-012), SecuriTeam |
| Next by Thread: | [TOOL] w3af - Web Application Attack and Audit Framework, SecuriTeam |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |