Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Computer Forensics Computer-Forensics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Converting an external hard drive enclosure into a write blocker?

Subject: Re: Converting an external hard drive enclosure into a write blocker?
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2007 21:49:07 -0800
Well this is a little one sided.

When you are preserving a hard disk you want a snapshot in the moment
it was seized. This would mean that you should not do any alteration
after that point and I'll ask you to consider two cases that will show
you where I come from.

1. The journal replay may overwrite some chunks of data you may want
to have linked the way they were. I.e. somebody did "rm -rf /" the
moment the agents were serving a no know warrant (and if they turned
off the machine the files will be still linked).

2. The kernel of the system you are running may have a bug that may
result in a different behavior than the system being investigated. (or
vice versa the system may had "special patches" applied that might
cause your data replay to corrupt data.
Even further think about a patch that ignores certain records of the
journal file and those records when applied by a "unpatched kernel"
unlink certain files (or overwrite them with random data).
You should also do separate analysis on the journal itself to
determine what contents it contains.
Having said all that I do not reject the ability to present as a
separate evidence replayed journal (*and note you did that*) to the
investigators/court.

Regards,
Krassi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>