Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Computer Forensics Computer-Forensics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Determining that someone is not the author of an offensive email

Subject: Re: Determining that someone is not the author of an offensive email
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 22:30:35 -0700
Hey Flavio, I don't have a great deal of advise to give, but I am curious about a few things:

I know literally nothing about Brazilian law, but how is it against the law to send an offensive email? And even if it is, how in the world do you get a search warrant for 12 people with no evidence directly linking any of them?

> There were 12 apartments connected to that ADSL line. All them had
> false IP numbers (198.162.???.???).

This was pointed out once before, but 192.162.x.x is very real (public) ip-space. 192.168.x.x is private (fake, if you will), I assume this is what you meant?

Do you know if the NAT router has wireless capabilities, or if ANY of the 12 people had a wireless access point? If so ANYONE could have attached to it and sent the message. There is also the possibility of one of their computers being compromised, in which case a remote attacker could have sent it through them.

> The message was forwarded by four mail servers:
> - Hotmail, timestamp 22:20 -0000
> - MSN. timestamp 22:20 -0000
> - a brazilian provider (BP), timestamp (16:20 -0300)
> - a brazilian company (BC), timestamp (16:20 -0300)

These times don't add up if -0300 is correct, just convert them to all to UTC:

Hotmail, timestamp 22:20 -0000
MSN. timestamp 22:20 -0000
brazilian provider (BP), timestamp (19:20 -0000)
brazilian company (BC), timestamp (19:20 -0000)

For this to be true MSN must have sent the message back in time 3 hours. It is more likely that 19:20 -0300 is correct, then the times match perfectly.

Just a few questions/thoughts,
Alan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>