Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Undetectable backdoor! help |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 7 Dec 2005 21:29:56 -0700 |
On 7 Dec 2005 00:55:05 -0000, x@y.cz <x@y.cz> wrote:
I had the same problem as you. First SpySheriff and then the strange winlogon behaviour (with manwithnoname.biz). I think I solved it with Spyware Doctor. I run fullsystem scan for several times, then also in safemode and the problem seems to dissapear. My firewall network activity watcher doesnt report the actvity of winlogon.exe any more. So try it and you will see.
I dealt with a similar problem recently; instructions from both McAfee and Symantec failed to fix it, although McAfee's scanner managed to pop up a warning every couple seconds that there was a virus. Winlogon was loading a dll at startup, which would check on shutdown that it was properly written into the registry so that it would be loaded again on startup. In short, you couldn't just delete registry entries, because they'd get written back again when you turned off the machine. The solution was to use SysInternals' Process Explorer to suspend the winlogon process, clean all references to that particular dll from the registry, and power off the computer without shutting down normally. -Josh
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why using fport if netstat -b does much more ?, keydet89 |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Undetectable backdoor - DETECTED, Costin Manda |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Undetectable backdoor! help, x |
| Next by Thread: | Why using fport if netstat -b does much more ?, contrera |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |