Computer Forensics: Re: Tools accepted by the courts

Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.

Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.

Computer Forensics Computer-Forensics

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tools accepted by the courts

from [subscribe] Network Security

[Permanent Link]

Subject:	Re: Tools accepted by the courts
Date:	Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:42:05 -0400

On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 12:27, Becky Nelson wrote:

Farmerdude - 

One major difference that I can tell is that the entire test has to be
completed in three days and is proctored, versus just the written test
being proctored.  The person taking the test will also need to show
that they can forensicially image a drive versus using an image
provided on a CD.  I think the differences are substantial.


The online portion CCE is a timed test.  The practical is a practical in
that you have to analyze an image and submit your findings in a report,
which is then reviewed by a committee.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but for the CCE, isn't the test image created
to work with a demo version of FTK - limited to 5000 objects?  I've
not taken the CCE myself but know several people that have, so I may
be misinformed.


You have been informed and/or misunderstand.  The image is just an
image, you can use whatever tool(s) you like  :)



regards,


farmerdude

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Tools accepted by the courts, (continued) RE: Tools accepted by the courts, Evidence Technology RE: Tools accepted by the courts, farrell RE: Tools accepted by the courts, Jerry Saperstein RE: Tools accepted by the courts, Jerry Saperstein RE: Tools accepted by the courts, Evidence Technology Re: Tools accepted by the courts, Jack Seward RE: Tools accepted by the courts, Evidence Technology Re: Tools accepted by the courts, Jack Seward Tools accepted by the courts, Becky Nelson Re: Tools accepted by the courts, subscribe Message not available Re: Tools accepted by the courts, subscribe <= RE: Tools accepted by the courts, Evidence Technology

Previous by Date:	Tools accepted by the courts, Becky Nelson
Next by Date:	RE: Tools accepted by the courts, Evidence Technology
Previous by Thread:	Re: Tools accepted by the courts, subscribe
Next by Thread:	RE: Tools accepted by the courts, Evidence Technology
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]