Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Tools accepted by the courts |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 15 Jun 2005 14:15:23 -0700 |
I'm involved in a discussion with some co-workers concerning forensic tools and the fact that evidence acquired with some tools is going to be more accepted in court than others. Has anyone encountered a situation where evidence extracted with a particular tool was not accepted? For example, an examiner using a "homemade" script to carve information from unallocated space versus a commercial carving tool. Robert
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Forensic disk duplication modifies the evidence hard disk, moeeba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Carving deleted messages from PST file remains, Jeff Lumley |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Forensic disk duplication modifies the evidence hard disk, moeeba |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tools accepted by the courts, Becky Nelson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |