Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Forensic disk duplication modifies the evidence hard disk |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 27 May 2005 13:26:07 -0400 |
This is a very interesting paper. I understand that the paper is written from the perspective of an investigator trying to track an attacker without the attacker knowing, but how does this present a problem for forensics analysis? How would this affect the admissibility of the evidence in court? Can't the changing SMART values be explained to a court as necessary for the device to power on? Also, since the values are read-only, is the integrity of the evidence tainted by powering on the device and creating an image? I'm not trying to be critical, I'm just trying to understand more about how this will affect the forensics community. I really enjoyed reading this paper. Nick -----Original Message----- From: Steven McLeod [mailto:steven.mcleod@ozemail.com.au] Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 7:22 AM To: forensics@securityfocus.com Subject: Forensic disk duplication modifies the evidence hard disk SMART Anti-Forensics This paper highlights an oversight in the current industry best practice procedure for forensically duplicating a hard disk. A discussion is provided which demonstrates that although the forensic duplication process may not directly modify data on the evidence hard disk, a hard disk will usually modify itself during the forensic duplication process. The paper highlights some consequences, for example that an attacker who has compromised the computer containing the hard disk can programmatically detect that the hard disk has been forensically duplicated, or otherwise powered on and accessed via a mechanism other than via the operating system installed on the hard disk. Suggestions are provided to help minimise the changes made to the hard disk during the forensic duplication process. These suggestions minimise the likelihood that an attacker will notice the system administrator or forensic analyst performing an investigation of the suspected compromised computer. http://members.ozemail.com.au/~steven.mcleod/SMART_Anti_Forensics.pdf ----------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Forensic disk duplication modifies the evidence hard disk, Brian Carrier |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Forensic disk duplication modifies the evidence hard disk, Dr. Marc Rogers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Forensic disk duplication modifies the evidence hard disk, Brian Carrier |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Forensic disk duplication modifies the evidence hard disk, Thierry Zoller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |