Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Computer Forensics Computer-Forensics
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Two hash

Subject: Re: Two hash
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2004 15:33:04 -0500
On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 13:45:35 +0100, LERTI - Paul Vidonne
<paul.vidonne@lerti.fr> wrote:
Hello,

How can a same physical disk can receive a different hash (MD5)
from EnCase and Linux md5sum ? (both through a drive lock) ?
Does smb meet this question ? Thanks.

--
LERTI - Laboratoire d'Expertise et de
  Recherche de Traces Informatiques
http://www.lerti.fr +33.4 76 90 65 97


I hate to say it, but I have never verified that those 2 md5 checksums
should match.  (ie. Encase may hash the drive + some of its own meta
data overhead.)

If encase does indeed only md5 hash the physical drive, you can still
get problems because:

1) Encase from windows definately does not capture the HPA (host
protected area) if it is present.  Linux with a 2.6 kernel will
capture the HPA, so if your drive has a HPA on it you would get a
disagreement.

2) I don't know if Encase from DOS captures the HPA or not, if not and
your disk has one, you again have a disagreement.

3) If you are using an external USB carrier, some of them have an
off-by-one error when reporting the total sectors of the drive.  This
can cause linux to not capture/hash the last sector.  I don't know how
dos/windows handles this.

I'm sure there are other potential issues as well, if none of the above.

Greg
-- 
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group

-----------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management 
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>