Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: MD5 Collisions and Evidence Integrity |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 11 Nov 2004 17:32:12 -0600 |
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 15:17, Jerry Shenk wrote:
It does seem that if we'd start doing md5sum and sha1sum hashes that that precaution might help in a few cases where some lawyer tries to prove that the md5sum isn't reliable.
But doesn't the opposing counsel have the requirement to show that the md5sum is not accurate and has been tampered with? Even in jury cases it shouldn't be that hard to convince the jury that an effort of biblical proportions is required to modify a file *to your liking* and still keep the same md5sum. I agree that 100% proof is not required as nothing is 100% bullet proof (or secure). Best evidence applies. Regards, Frank
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
| Previous by Date: | Re: MD5 Collisions and Evidence Integrity, Jack Seward |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mactimes, Frank Knobbe |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: MD5 Collisions and Evidence Integrity, Svein Yngvar Willassen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MD5 Collisions and Evidence Integrity, Gavin Reid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |