Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: mactimes |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 11 Nov 2004 12:27:17 -0800 |
"Potter, Timothy" <Timothy.F.Potter@pjc.com> 11/10/2004 8:29:38 AMIf mactimes can easily be modified by a hacker, then would I know, and
how
would mactimes be utilized in court? I have a Microsoft Excel file on a fat12 floppy disk. Here are the mactimes: modified: 9/28/2004 @ 9:12AM CST accessed: 9/29/2004 @ 4:38PM CST created: 10/1/2004 @ 1:12 AM So, how can the created time be later than the last modified time??
This
doesn't help in establishing a clear timeline of events.. Thanks,
-Tim When Windows makes a copy of a file, if the Modified time is available, it duplicates that data -- because the file hasn't been "modified", per se. The file was created, but nothing was changed within it. For example, I have: C:\WINNT\KB329115.log Created: November 17, 2003, 10:39:37 Modified: November 17, 2003, 10:39:48 Accessed: November 11, 2004, 12:10:06 I made a copy of it to the same folder: C:\WINNT\Copy of KB329115.log Created: November 11, 2004, 12:10:20 Modified: November 17, 2003, 10:39:48 Accessed: November 11, 2004, 12:10:20 So the file has not been "modified", strictly speaking. It was just duplicated. But that is Windows. A quick check on my Linux machine shows that using cp, without options, to duplicate a file resets both the created and modified times: cp samba-2.2.12.tar.gz copy-of-samba-2.2.12.tar.gz samba-2.2.12.tar.gz Created: October 26, 2004, 14:20 Modified: September 29, 2004, 06:51 copy-of-samba-2.2.12.tar.gz Created: November 11, 2004, 12:17 Modified: November 11, 2004, 12:17 It loses the previous times. But if I copy the file with the -p switch, I get different results: cp -p samba-2.2.12.tar.gz copy-of-samba-2.2.12.tar.gz samba-2.2.12.tar.gz Created: October 26, 2004, 14:20 Modified: September 29, 2004, 06:51 copy-of-samba-2.2.12.tar.gz Created: November 11, 2004, 12:18 Modified: September 29, 2004, 06:51 Under Windows, if you create a new file, then I think it's possible for it to not have a modified time. I've seen files with just a Created time. I don't believe that's the same under Linux/UNIX. So for Windows, copying a file will set the times as shown. Under Linux/UNIX, the results depend on how the person did it. Matt ----------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: MD5 Collisions and Evidence Integrity, Svein Yngvar Willassen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: MD5 Collisions and Evidence Integrity, Jack Seward |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: mactimes, Jason Coombs |
| Next by Thread: | Re: mactimes (ctime on unix is not creation but change time), Martin Mačok |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |