Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Encrypted Disks |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:42:25 -0400 |
We agree on that, George. That's exactly what I'm saying....don't boot the drive and try to decrypt it....if he does that, at best he's modified the evidence and at worst, he screws it up and destroys everything. We're arguing on the same side on this one. -----Original Message----- From: George M. Garner Jr. [mailto:gmgarner@erols.com] Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 2:29 PM To: 'Bowes, Ronald (EST)' Cc: forensics@securityfocus.com Subject: RE: Encrypted Disks Jerry,
From the previous discussion I am assuming that the laptop already is
powered down. In that case, the prudent course of action is indeed to "image" the encrypted drive and work from a copy, or better from a copy of the copy. I would not power the laptop back up with the drive in its bay except under truly exceptional circumstances. Once you take that step you have passed a point of no return.
a) The encryption software also does checksums, and I'm not sure if an image of the disk will still pass the checksums or not <
From an imaging tool's perspective an encrypted drive is no different
than an unencrypted drive (assuming that Ultimaco does not modify the firmware on the hard drive). An imaging tool simply copies raw un-interpreted bytes from one location to another. If the imaging tool works then the checksums should match. Of course it is always possible that Ultimaco's software looks at the bios information on the drive firmware to verify that the information has not been copied from the original drive. (That would be truly clever.) However, the drive bios information is simply a piece of software configuration stored in the drive's memory. You can change it with the appropriate tools and the drive's manufacturer should be able to help you out in that regard. If you obtain another drive of the same make and model you should be able to make it look like the original drive as far as Ultimaco's software is concerned. I notice that Ultimaco has an "Easy bootable rescue image" posted on their web site. While they do not state what operating system it uses it is almost certainly one for which there already is imaging software available. Perhaps you can image the encrypted drive, restore the image to a drive of the same make and model, etc., add imaging software to Ultimaco's "Easy bootable rescue image" and use the modified rescue disk to decrypt and copy the restored image. That way if something goes wrong you can always make another copy and try again. Ultimaco's software is available. Make an encrypted disk of your own using Ultimao's product and test proposed acquisition methods. If a method is found to alter the original in some respect, document what those changes are and relate them to the question that you are trying to determine. Even if a method is found to alter the original in some respect, the changes may not be material to the issue sub judice. Even if the changes are found to be material, you may be able to validate your inferences using other evidence gathered in a different way. The worst thing from an evidentiary perspective is not to know what you have. As long as your methods are well-thought-out, well-documented and well-tested the trier of fact will be in a position to sort fact from fiction and to give your evidence its proper weight. The best evidence rule is not an impossible evidence rule. Interpreting the rule otherwise would result in every terrorist or drug dealer on the globe using Ultimaco's software. Regards, George. ----------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com ----------------------------------------------------------------- This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service. For more information on this free incident handling, management and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: Encrypted Disks, IanC @ TracingEmails |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Tracking Email Through Known SPAM Site, Aaron Stanley |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Encrypted Disks, George M. Garner Jr. |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Encrypted Disks, Joel A. Folkerts |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |