Ethical Hacking Training at InfoSec Institute

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Computer Forensics Computer-Forensics
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Shred. Was: Securely wiping...

Subject: RE: Shred. Was: Securely wiping...
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:34:57 -0400
If the device is or closely emulates SCSI control, there are options in
the format low level command which (if implemented) can get a drive to
ignore its bad sector maps, starting over. If cleaning a disk, then, using
these commands after a normal pass should give the most access to any
bad sectors which is possible to the drive hardware and allow it to be
overwritten.

A few bits here and there might escape destruction by these means, but
also, arguably, a few bits on "known corrupted" sectors may prove very 
little.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nathan R. Valentine [mailto:nathan@nathanvalentine.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 2:30 PM
To: forensics@securityfocus.com
Subject: Shred. Was: Securely wiping...



From the 'shred' info page:


<snip>

   Generally speaking, it is more reliable to shred a device than a
file, since this bypasses the problem of filesystem design mentioned
above.  However, even shredding devices is not always completely
reliable.  For example, most disks map out bad sectors invisibly to the
application; if the bad sectors contain sensitive data, `shred' won't
be able to destroy it.

</snip>


I guess that means that I can go outside this weekend. ;)


-- 
Nathan R. Valentine <nathan@nathanvalentine.org>


**********************************************************************
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential 
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, 
or use of the information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is 
STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you received this transmission in error, please 
immediately contact the sender and destroy the material in its entirety, 
whether in electronic or hard copy format. Thank you
**********************************************************************


-----------------------------------------------------------------
This list is provided by the SecurityFocus ARIS analyzer service.
For more information on this free incident handling, management 
and tracking system please see: http://aris.securityfocus.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>