Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [CISSP-D] Question |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:57:15 -0800 (PST) |
Hi there, What I understand, there are two cases when a collusion is expected. 1) If some one wants to get un-authorised access. (to defeat a preventive control) 2) If some one is caught and wants not to be highlighted. (to defeat a detective control) The question says "in order to get access to data" which means that a mishap has not taken place as yet. I mean he still do not have a certain access. So he should collude with the one who has authorization rights to get un-authorised access. Mr. Kasturi commented "I think 1 is corect. Collusion is necessitated only
when the person doesnt have access to a particular function"
What I believe collusion can also be observed if someone is caught by another person if he is doing something wrong and his job has been rotated. Please correct me if I am wrong.. best Regards, --- Kasturi Narahari Rao <naraharirao.kasturi@cmcltd.com> wrote:
Hi... I think 1 is corect. Collusion is necessitated only when the person doesnt have access to a particular function. Only option 1 talks about 'limiting the local access of operations personnel', in which case he/she has to necessarily collude with another operator who has the necessary autjhorization for access, so as to access data to which he/she is not authorized because 'access was limited '. Regards Narahari --- In CISSP-Discuss@yahoogroups.com, "Mooney Sherman" <Mooney.Sherman@g...> wrote:Hi Waheed: I would say - 2- Job rotation of operationspersonnel.because this may provide access to various unauthorized resources at different times by various personnel - so it would be difficult to audit and keep track of the unauthorized data and how it is used. Unless auditing was turned on for authorized/unauthorized and reviewed deligently to see who is accessing what - this may help in tracking the culprit but won't prevent the damage from occuring.Cheers Mooney -----Original Message----- From: CISSP-Discuss@yahoogroups.com [mailto:CISSP-Discuss@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of Waleed OmerSent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 8:05 AM To: CISSP-Discuss@yahoogroups.com Subject: [CISSP-D] Question Dear Colleagues, I would like to know if you have a definite answerfor this quiz:Which of the following security controls mightforce an operator into collusion with personnel assigned organizationally within different function in order to gain access to unauthorized data?1- Limiting the local access of operationspersonnel.2- Job rotation of operations personnel. 3- Management monitoring of audit logs. 4- Enforcing regular password changes. Thanks & Regards, Waleed Omar _____ YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS * Visit your group " CISSP-Discuss<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss> " on the web.* To unsubscribe from this group, send an emailto:CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com<mailto:CISSP-Discuss- unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to theYahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> ._____
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---------This communication is intended for the use of therecipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---------This communication is intended for the use of therecipient to which it is addressed, and may contain confidential, personal, and or privileged information. Please contact us immediately if you are not the intended recipient of this communication, and do not copy, distribute, or take action relying on it. Any communication received in error, or subsequent reply, should be deleted or destroyed.
SYED ALI ABBAS Technology & Security Risk Services SIDAT HYDER MORSHED ASSOCIATES (PVT) LTD Management Consultants A Member of Ernst & Young International __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/kgFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CISSP-D] Elementary question - ComparisonWithCISA & Suggested Books, accounts |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CISSP-D] Question, vishwameet chawla |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CISSP-D] Question, Kasturi Narahari Rao |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CISSP-D] Question, vishwameet chawla |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |