Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security CISSP-Discussion
[Top] [All Lists]

[CISSP-D] Re: Work factor of Birthday attacks

Subject: [CISSP-D] Re: Work factor of Birthday attacks
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:30:57 -0800
Date sent:              Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:11:24 +0100
From:                   Labib Ramy <Ramy.Labib@eg.fujitsu.com>

In Cryptographic Domain:
Can someone please explain the following: 

MD5 produces a 128 bit digest. Birthday attacks mounted against MD5 use only
(128/2) 64 bit (2 to the power of 64 possibilities) SHA-1 produces a 160 bit
digest. Birthday attacks mounted against SHA use only (160/2) 80 bit (2 to the
power of 80 possibilities)

Question is: Why 64 bits & 80 bits ???

The Birthday Attack is based on the fact that comparing many items to many 
items results in a greater chance of a match than simply matching one to one.  
The formula (extremely simplified) boils down to the result that you need a 
cluster 
the size of the square root of the address space.  Thus, (roughly) 20 people's 
birthdays will generate a match out of the (roughly) 400 days in a year.  (OK, 
I 
*said* this was extremely simplified: for birthdays the actual numbers are 23 
and 
365.)

The square root of 2^128 is 2^64, and for 2^160 is 2^80.

(Note also that recent work has shown that SHA is subject to an analytic attack 
that greatly reduces the cluster size needed for a Birthday Attack, and that 
MD5 
may be subject to the same or similar exploit.)

======================  (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rslade@vcn.bc.ca      slade@victoria.tc.ca      rslade@sun.soci.niu.edu
      Metabolically challenged - politically correct term for dead
http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev    or    http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade



 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>