Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [CISSP-D] Re: Work factor of Birthday attacks |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:30:57 -0800 |
Date sent: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 07:11:24 +0100 From: Labib Ramy <Ramy.Labib@eg.fujitsu.com>
In Cryptographic Domain: Can someone please explain the following: MD5 produces a 128 bit digest. Birthday attacks mounted against MD5 use only (128/2) 64 bit (2 to the power of 64 possibilities) SHA-1 produces a 160 bit digest. Birthday attacks mounted against SHA use only (160/2) 80 bit (2 to the power of 80 possibilities) Question is: Why 64 bits & 80 bits ???
The Birthday Attack is based on the fact that comparing many items to many
items results in a greater chance of a match than simply matching one to one.
The formula (extremely simplified) boils down to the result that you need a
cluster
the size of the square root of the address space. Thus, (roughly) 20 people's
birthdays will generate a match out of the (roughly) 400 days in a year. (OK,
I
*said* this was extremely simplified: for birthdays the actual numbers are 23
and
365.)
The square root of 2^128 is 2^64, and for 2^160 is 2^80.
(Note also that recent work has shown that SHA is subject to an analytic attack
that greatly reduces the cluster size needed for a Birthday Attack, and that
MD5
may be subject to the same or similar exploit.)
====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer)
rslade@vcn.bc.ca slade@victoria.tc.ca rslade@sun.soci.niu.edu
Metabolically challenged - politically correct term for dead
http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev or http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CISSP-D] Work factor of Birthday attacks, Labib Ramy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CISSP-D] Re: Work factor of Birthday attacks, Larry D. Weiner |
| Previous by Thread: | [CISSP-D] Work factor of Birthday attacks, Labib Ramy |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CISSP-D] Re: Work factor of Birthday attacks, Larry D. Weiner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |