Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [CISSP-D] Symmetric Key and authentication. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 15 May 2005 05:57:59 -0000 |
Symmetric Key Cryptography provides confidentiality, authentication, and integrity. You can think of authentication in this case as a "weak" form of authentication for the following reasons: Basis: only the Alice AND Bob know the key to encrypt or decrypt the message. 1) So if Bob is able to decrypt the message then the Bob knows it came from Alice since he knows he did not send it. 2) Bob cannot prove to anyone else (say Clyde) that the message came from Alice since any such message could have been produced by either Alice or Bob. This later case is referred to as non-repudiation. Asymmetric cryptography CAN provide encryption (confidentiality and integrity), authentication, key exchange, and non-repudiation. Basis: A message encrypted by Alice (in Alice's private key) can be decrypted by anybody (from Alice's public) key, but only could have been encrypted by Alice (since Alice's public key decrypts the message). a) The receiver of Alice's message (Bob) can show the still encrypted message to anybody, who can then independently verify the message came from Alice (by decrypting the message using Alice's public key). The Shon Harris book glosses over the difference between "authentication" (in the symmetric crypto sense) and non- repudiation. Also be careful about the information in a lot of these books regarding the capabilities of the various assymetric algorithms. A couple of key points are as follows: D-H: key exchange only El Gamal: Key Exchange, Encryption (C and I), and Non-repudiation RSA: Key Exchange, Encryption (C and I), and Non-repudiation Regards, Doug Landoll, CISSP, CISA President, Veridyn Inc (512) 310-2228 --- In CISSP-Discuss@yahoogroups.com, Vijay Kumar <vijaychhipa@y...> wrote:
Manish Your comments are in-line with what is logical. However the Shon
Harris
book mentioned that authentication can not be had with Symmetric
only encryption.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CISSP-D] System-high security mode vs Compartmented security mode, Fritz Ames |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [CISSP-D] Re: question on studying, email2mno |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [CISSP-D] Symmetric Key and authentication., Vijay Kumar |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CISSP-D] Symmetric Key and authentication., Doug Landoll |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |