Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [CISSP-D] Re: Critique my CISSP Exam tackling technique |
|---|---|
| Date: | Mon, 14 Mar 2005 14:03:27 -0800 |
Date sent: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 12:28:11 -0000 From: "huang_qinghua" <huang_qinghua@yahoo.com>
I have thought of a plan to tackle the CISSP Exam. Please take a look.
Good points, and the practicalities are seldom discussed.
1. Do not skip questions.
Two answers to this: 1a. Correct, do not skip any questions. Answer *everything*, even if you have to guess. You do not get marks taken off for incorrect answers, so, if you don't know the answer, "guessing" gives you a 25% chance of getting the marks for those questions. Do not leave anything unanswered.
For questions which one is unsure shade the best answer u think at that time. Put a question at the side of the question number or write down the question number to signify that the question is in doubt and the need to review it later. My point is that if one does skip questions, there is always the probability of shading wrongly. It will be disasterous should one find out after the 250th question.
1b. Is basically addressed by the question below:
3. If completed ahead of time, check and recheck. No point leaving the examination hall early. One had paid a substantial amount of cash to take the exam. Utilize the full six hours (Enjoy the aircon :) )
This is a debatable suggestion. Some say to do the easy questions first, and then come back and do the hard ones. Others say to go straight through and answer every question as you get to it. I would recommend going straight through: it is really easy to outsmart yourself by second-guessing yourself. However, I would suggest going through and doing every tenth question, first. (Question 10, 20, 30, etc.) The answer sheet is a mark sense card with about 400 rows of circles on it. It is really easy to get out of synch and answer the question in the wrong row (which, of course, means you get all the answers wrong). Doing every tenth question gives you a regular checkpoint to make sure you are on the right line.
4. 250 questions in 6hrs comes to 1.5 mins per question. Pace yourself to that timeline. Never exceed uneccessarily.
Consider it more as 42-43 questions per hour. Easier to figure out whether you are on track.
5. If there comes a question with contradicting/similar answers. The correct answer normally is the one which I thought of the first . Its about the first impression is always the right one. In conclusion, if you can't decide, rely on frist impressions. Maybe its me. But I find this particularly effective. The mind worked in a way that, the more you think of a problem. The more in doubt you are.
Good advice. The exam is meant to test your experience. If you have the experience, your first impression will probably be right. (If you've read the question, and all the answers, carefully.)
6. Use elimination methods. Weed out answers which are definitely incorrect.
If you can. Sometimes elimination doesn't work too well. Those are the questions that make all the difference :-) ====================== (quote inserted randomly by Pegasus Mailer) rslade@vcn.bc.ca slade@victoria.tc.ca rslade@sun.soci.niu.edu You have all the characteristics of a popular politician: a horrible voice, bad breeding, and a vulgar manner. - Aristophanes http://victoria.tc.ca/techrev or http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~rslade Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CISSP-D] Critique my CISSP Exam tackling technique, Terry J. Hawkins |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CISSP-D] REVIEW: "The Information Security Dictionary", Urs E. Gattiker, Rob, grandpa of Ryan, Trevor, Devon & Hannah |
| Previous by Thread: | [CISSP-D] Critique my CISSP Exam tackling technique, huang_qinghua |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [CISSP-D] Critique my CISSP Exam tackling technique, stout |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |