Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [CISSP-D] Risk Assessment Automation. |
|---|---|
| Date: | Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:16:18 -0000 |
Nadeem, I am glad to hear that you were not confusing vulnerability scanning and SRA. It sounds like you know what you are doing here. Sorry for my confusion. Also I would concur with most of the reply posts that give examples like RiskWatch, NIST ASSET, and a few others. You may want to consider the following points: Flexibility: Some tools / methods have specific method that you must follow (I believe CORBA falls in this camp). If this method works for you great if not, this would not be a good tool for you. Completeness: Some tools / methods automate or provide a process for a portion of the risk assessment but don't cover all of it. I belive OCTAVE and @RISK fall into this camp. OCTAVE provides a fraework for handling the process but does not provide any method on the "how" (the idea is that specific SRA methods would become "OCTAVE- compliant"). @RISK is a fantastic tool for performing statistical calculations, monte carlo simulation, etc. This is clearly only a piece of the puzzle. Rigor: Some recent tools including anything that calls itself a "self-assessment" tool are lacking in rigor. If your SRA is meant to be performed by those who implement the controls and finish in a week or two then these tools are for you. Personally, I think it is great to perform checks for workmanship, but I would never call these risk assessments. I believe SRAs need to be performed independently and not by the internal team that set up the security controls. Lastly, it sounds like you have a team that knows what they are doing so I am not aiming this at you BUT I am generally worried about the direction that some of these tools and methods can be taking the industry if we start running these as an "automated process." A security risk assessment is an objective review of the security contols and their ability to meet business objectives. No tool in the world can automate that process - it takes judgement and analysis. Again, I think it is great to have tools that make the number crunching and questionnaire distribution easier, but I fear in the future SRAs will be peddled by local IT shops who have learned an interface but not the discipline of security. Regards, Doug ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/kgFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CISSP-D] Anyone taken the SSCP exam?, Ali Khan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [CISSP-D] Anyone taken the SSCP exam?, Brian Smithson |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [CISSP-D] BS7799 ppt presentation, WAJAHAT IQBAL |
| Next by Thread: | [CISSP-D] ISSEP exam/training, Don Patterson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |