Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | [CISSP-D] Re: Q: Subject/Object sensitive label in Multi-level security |
|---|---|
| Date: | Sun, 21 Nov 2004 02:50:32 -0000 |
Answer D is correct. You may be misunderstanding the concepts here. 1) The question refers to a confidentiality MAC policy. This policy (as implemented in BLP) states "no read down" - i.e., a top secret user cannot read a secret file. and "no write up" a secret user process may not write to a top secret file. 2) Domination. The short hand way of talking about these security policies are "no read up" and "no write down" but to be more specific you must understand the concept of domination. It basically means that the for label A to dominate label B, label A must have a equal to or greater than security level than label B (e.g., "Top Secret" vs. "Secret") and must have all the categories of B (e.g. "Top Secret - AZUL" vs. "Secret - AZUL"). (see any CISSP book for an explanation). 3) Answer A can be interpretted to mean "Write Down" Answer B is nonsense and uses nonstandard terms Answer C is nonsense and uses nonstandard terms Answer D can be interpretted to mean "Write Up" "Write Down" is prohibited whereas "Write Up" is allowed therefore answer D and not A is correct. --- In CISSP-Discuss@yahoogroups.com, Weifeng Bao <go2sailing@y...> wrote:
Here is the question from cccure.org quiz:
Q: what is necessary for a subject to have write
access to an object in a Multi-level security policy?
A. The subject's sensitivity label must dominate the
object's sensitivity label.
B. The subject's sensitivity label subordinates the
object's sensitivity label.
C. The subject's sensitivity label is subordinated by
the object's senstivity label.
D. The subject's sensitivity label is dominated by the
object's sensitivity label.
The given answer D. However, I think the answer
should be A. Do I misunderstand the keywords or
concept here?
Thanks.
--Weifeng
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kgFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [CISSP-D] Fw: Two questions about Security Models and Architecture in All-In-One, Doug Landoll |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [CISSP-D] Q: Subject/Object sensitive label in Multi-level security, Bill Royds |
| Previous by Thread: | [CISSP-D] Q: Subject/Object sensitive label in Multi-level security, Weifeng Bao |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [CISSP-D] Q: Subject/Object sensitive label in Multi-level security, Bill Royds |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |