Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [CISSP-D] Two questions about Security Models and Architecture in All-In-One |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:06:16 -0000 |
1) It is A because the Biba model is all about integrity. Bell-Lapadula is all
about confidentiality.
2) The two rules for the Biba model are 'No write up'-* integrity axiom and 'No
read down' - simple integrity axiom.
The three for Bell-Lapadula are 'No read up' - simple security
rule/property, 'no write down' - * property, 'no write up and no read down' -
strong star property. Therefore, D should be the answer
Mags
----- Original Message -----
From: wang shujing
To: Cissp-yahoogroup
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 4:28 AM
Subject: [CISSP-D] Two questions about Security Models and Architecture in
All-In-One
Hi, everybody,
I read the All In One. The following two questions confused me. would you
please help me?
Chap.5---22
Which best describes the *-integrity axiom?
A. No wirte up in the Biba model
B. No read down in the Biba model
C. No write down in the Bell-lapadula model
D. No read up in the Bell-lapadula model
The answer is A. Why not C?
Chap.5---23
Which best describes the simple security rule?
A. No wirte up in the Biba model
B. No read down in the Biba model
C. No write down in the Bell-lapadula model
D. No read up in the Bell-lapadula model
The answer is D. Why not B?
The Bell-lapadula has the simple security rule, the *-property rule.
The Biba has two integrity rules.
I think the first one is because of the "integrity". What's the reason for
the second one? Is there special names for Biba rules?
Thanks a lot.
Shujing
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
a.. To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CISSP-Discuss/
b.. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
CISSP-Discuss-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
c.. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.3.1 - Release Date: 15/11/2004
No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.289 / Virus Database: 265.3.1 - Release Date: 15/11/2004
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [CISSP-D] Two questions about Security Models and Architecture in All-In-One, wang shujing |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [CISSP-D] Fw: Two questions about Security Models and Architecture in All-In-One, Bill Royds |
| Previous by Thread: | [CISSP-D] Two questions about Security Models and Architecture in All-In-One, wang shujing |
| Next by Thread: | [CISSP-D] Q: Subject/Object sensitive label in Multi-level security, Weifeng Bao |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |