Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Bugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day

Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:38:43 -0400
You do an excellent job of cross list carbon copy attacking (clcca 
is new 0day attack terminology), Gadi.  While CLCCA is an 
abbreviation for technical terminology, 0day is simply slang.  
Since you somewhere state that everyone is an expert in their own 
delusional little words, perhaps you can find your expertise in 
figuring out what the word slang means.  A bot herder such as 
yourself might wish to use m-w.com in their internet exploration 
tools.

One would imagine that with all the cardiovascular excursion you 
gain from typing these long-winded, non-technical, non-important, 
and otherwise entirely fucking stupid posts that you might start 
burning weight.  Perhaps you should try Clenbuturol.  Or if you are 
committed to weight gain, kerosene might help you get to our ideal 
weight for you - 21 grammes.  

Thank you and good night.

On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 15:02:27 -0400 Gadi Evron <ge@linuxbox.org> 
wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Thor (Hammer of God) wrote:
For the record, the original term "O-Day" was coined by a 
dyslexic
security engineer who listened to too much Harry Belafonte while 
working
all night on a drink of rum.  It's true.  Really.

t

Okay. I think we exhausted the different views, and maybe we are 
now able 
to come to a conlusion on what we WANT 0day to mean.

What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless 
of 
previous definitions?

Obviously, the term has become charged in the past couple of years 
with 
the targeted office vulnerabilities attacks, WMF, ANI, etc.

We require a term to address these, just as much as we do 
"unpatched 
vulnerability" or "fully disclosed vulnerability".

What other such descriptions should we consider before proceeding? 

non-disclosure?

      Gadi.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

--
Click for a credit repair consultation, raise your FICO score.
http://tagline.hushmail.com/fc/Ioyw6h4d7lxd9hH5bRhPxdGavPWdS58qgUb2LsEDsGNIcv7vffNXKo/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html
Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [Full-disclosure] defining 0day, full-disclosure <=