Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: defining 0day |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:20:52 -0700 |
What do you, as professional, believe 0day should mean, regardless of previous definitions?
I think there is some slight residual usefulness to designating
vulnerabilities whose first public disclosure results from
discovery/analysis of an active exploit already "in the wild". ("0 days"
thus being the elapsed time from public disclosure of the vulnerability to
appearance of a live threat exploiting it, a characteristic which an unknown
vulnerability may only aspire to, and a patched one may never live down.)
David Gillett
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: defining 0day, Gadi Evron |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] 0-day inquiry, Juergen Marester |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: defining 0day, Andrew Weaver |
| Next by Thread: | Re: defining 0day, Charles Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |