Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network? |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:41:33 -0800 (PST) |
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007, Darren Reed wrote:
In some mail from greimer@fccc.edu, sie said:
1) This seems like a case of "old code" somehow creeping back in to the current versions, and that's a phenomenon I've seen happen at a couple of different places that I've worked at over the years. It's kind of a special case of version control gone bad, and I'm interested in how that can happen and how to watch out for it.
1a) People have said that this bug was in old versions of SunOS/Solaris (and AIX I think) but nobody ever nailed down exactly when this was fixed, versionwise. In fact, did anybody reproduce this in anything other than Solaris 10? It'd be nice to know the last old version that has the bug, & the 1st that doesn't.
Solaris's /bin/login has never supported the "-f" command line option until Solaris 10 (RTFM) so this exploit was just plain not possible.
$ uname -a SunOS mybox 5.8 Generic_117350-44 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2 $ login login: ^C $ login -f asdfasdf $ man login
NAME
login - sign on to the systemSYNOPSIS
login [ -p ] [ -d device ] [ -h hostname | [ terminal ] |
-r hostname ] [ name [ environ ] ... ]The other avenue for passing command line args to telnet is through the TERM telnet option, but Solaris stopped passing that through on the command line a long time ago (maybe 2.3 or earlier?)
2) Does this have anything to do with the OpenSolaris effort?
No.
Like are people pulling in code from other sources?
More people should go back and read Casper's email where he explained that it came about with a Kerberos project.
I presume that refers only to the telnetd bug, and not to login -f.
-- Nate Eldredge nge@cs.hmc.edu
| Previous by Date: | RE: Drive-by Pharming Threat, Memisyazici, Aras |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | DotClear v1.2.5, k4rtal |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?, Darren Reed |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Solaris telnet vulnberability - how many on your network?, Cromar Scott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |