Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Fun with event logs (semi-offtopic) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:20:54 +0100 |
There is interesting thing with event logging on Windows. The only security aspect of it is event log record tampering and performance degradation, but it may become sensitive is some 3rd party software is used for automated event log analysis.
I doubt this. The event logs don't contain the actual formatted string, because the template string is localized and only retrieved when the entry is displayed - what is logged is just a message id and the string inserts (see documentation for EVENTLOGRECORD). FormatMessage (which is used to build the full message to display to the user) isn't the culprit, either, because it doesn't operate recursively (that would have bizarre consequences, since FormatMessage also performs automatic line wrapping and indenting) - to prove it quickly and cheaply, make a copy of ntoskrnl.exe as "%1.exe" and try to run it: the error message you get back is prepared with FormatMessage (see kernel32, message table, entry 129), and it doesn't exhibit recursion I think this is just a fairly minor bug/feature of the standard event log viewer, and wouldn't affect log analyzers, unless they implement this counterintuitive behavior (that was probably coded to support some pathological case where a single pass of formatting wasn't enough). But I expect log analyzers would rather work with the message source + id than the formatted display message, anyway
Most services do not escape any user-supplied input then constructing log event.
They are not supposed to, in fact that would damage the log. A human being might be fooled (for example you could embed newlines and fake fields in multi-line messages), but an automatic analysis tool will always see exactly the parameters passed _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Fun with event logs (semi-offtopic), Michele Cicciotti |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OpenPKG-SA-2006.041] OpenPKG Security Advisory (dbus), OpenPKG GmbH |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Fun with event logs (semi-offtopic), Michele Cicciotti |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Full-disclosure] Fun with event logs (semi-offtopic), 3APA3A |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |