Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Bugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: "Local" and "Remote" considered insufficient

Subject: Re: "Local" and "Remote" considered insufficient
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:47:52 -0600
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 11:42 -0600, Eric Knight wrote:
Remote Authenticated
Remote Unauthenticated
Local Authenticated
Local Unauthenticated.

This is the beginning of the taxnomy matrix.  


Greetings!

I'm currently catching up with emails and came across this (slightly
aged) thread. The matrix above categorizes on the "locality" of the
attack executor (being remote, exploiting a buffer overflow through the
network, or local, exploiting a suid vulnerability). It also categorizes
on the "condition of the executor" itself (anonymous/unauthenticated or
credentialed/authenticated).

However, I think there is another factor to consider when classifying
vulnerabilities -- that of the "timeliness" of the attack. I believe the
matrix should be enhanced to include:

Immediate: An attack performed will have an immediate impact on the
target. An example is the remote buffer overflow.

Delayed: An attack is initiated now, but executed later. Examples
include most email-borne viruses, trojans, malware, etc.

Including the timeliness of the attack is important, especially when
considering the adverse effects on surrounding infrastructure. An email
virus doesn't spread quite as fast as a worm like SQL slammer.


Given these three criteria, we could classify as follows:

                                     Timeliness / User Level / Locality

Daemon buffer overflow:              Immediate anonymous remote
Setuid exploitation:                 Immediate anonymous local
Emailing a setuid exploit[1]:        Delayed anonymous local
Emailing a rm -rf / script[1]:       Delayed authenticated local
Backdoor script on web page:         Delayed authenticated local
Emailing overflow to virus gateway:  Delayed anonymous remote


[1] The emailed setuid exploit script will elevate privileges by itself
while the rm -rf / requires privileges in order to be effective. This
point is probably debatable :) 


I apologies for bringing this topic up again, but I think it is
important that we find consensus on these classifications.
So I respectfully submit: Immediate/delayed

Regards,
Frank

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: "Local" and "Remote" considered insufficient, Frank Knobbe <=