Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | RE: Microsoft's GDI Detetection Tool faults |
|---|---|
| Date: | Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:14:25 -0700 |
I tested the SANS tool against a properly patched XP system on Friday and found it to false positive on many of the locations it said it wouldn't test on.
What the FAQ says is that you should ignore the results for certain directories, not that it won't test them. "FAQ Ignore files in directories like Windows\$NtUniinstallKBxxxxx\ and Windows\WinSxS. These are old versions left behind for uninstal purposes."
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: New whitepaper "The Phishing Guide", Philip Stoev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes, Casper Dik |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Microsoft's GDI Detetection Tool faults, Dowling, Gabrielle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Microsoft's GDI Detetection Tool faults, albatross |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |