Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Bugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account

Subject: Re: Diebold Global Election Management System (GEMS) Backdoor Account Allows Authenticated Users to Modify Votes
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:13:11 -0700
On Wed, 2004-09-22 at 09:19, Jay Hennigan wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 pressinfo@diebold.com wrote:

In-Reply-To: <20040831203815.13871.qmail@www.securityfocus.com>

Diebold strongly refutes the existence of any "back doors" or "hidden 
codes" in its GEMS software.  These inaccurate allegations appear to stem 
from those not familiar with the product, misunderstanding the purpose of 
legitimate structures in the database.  These structures are well 
documented and have been reviewed (including at a source code level) by 
independent testing authorities as required by federal election regulations.

Vendor URL:  www.diebold.com/dieboldes/GEMS.htm (Links to External Site)

Heh.  If the above URL indicates the competence level of Diebold, be
very afraid.  Note the prominent photo of a Sun server with the text
touting Microsoft Windows.

What scares me is that the people at black box voting demonstrated using
a monkey to hack the election. An actual honest to go monkey as part of
their five (!) different methods to hack the vote.

For those that missed it five POC attacks on Die Bold:
http://www.blackboxvoting.org/?q=node/view/114&PHPSESSID=de909c061d97a933df77534fe04dc883

Five different methods to hack the vote, one of which uses a zoo animal.
It's so easy that it can almost be done accidentally. But it's important
to note, it's by *design* that it can be tampered with. The system was
designed without any regard to security.

If you or someone you know is interested in stopping things like this
from actually affecting the next election, you should call your
representatives *NOW*. Even if you aren't entirely interested in the
issue, you should ask them why they are buying products that are
demonstrably flawed. Ask them to change their systems before the next
election. People need to be held accountable for this. If the response
you are given is that it's not possible to implement it in time before
the election, simply ask for a paper ballot. A voter verified paper
trail makes voting accountable. It makes recounts possible, it means we
as a country make the choice, not Die Bold as a company.

Verified Voting Foundation (www.verifiedvoting.org) is also going to
provide an Election Incident Reporting System (EIRS) for the day of the
election. If you see something fishy, someone hacking the vote, someone
turning away voters, someone tampering, report it!

-- 
Jacob Appelbaum <jacob@verifiedvoting.org>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>