Ethical Hacking Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package. | Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors. |

| Subject: | Re: Netscape Navigator 7.2 failure to isolate browser tabs (was Re: Computer Network Defence Vulnerability Alert State) |
|---|---|
| Date: | Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:58:08 -0500 |
Might as well try and be useful with this and see what other Mac browsers get bitten by this bug. Do note that all my tests have been done on MacOS X 10.3.5, with the latest Java 1.4.2 Update 1 and Developer packages installed. Netscape Navigator 7.2 - Vulnerable (subject of the original mail) Netscape Navigator 7.1 - Vulnerable (buggy here too) Netscape Navigator 7.0.2 - NOT vulnerable (Amazing ! Ain't we supposed to be improving over time ?) Mozilla 1.7.2 - Vulnerable (figures; Navigator 7.2 is based on this) Firefox 0.9.3 - Vulnerable (Mozilla's kid brother, limps from same foot...) Camino 0.8.1 - NOT vulnerable (some residue might appear on the next tab, but applet is inoperative) Opera 7.5.4 - NOT vulnerable (does not have tabbed browsing) iCab 2.9.8 - NOT vulnerable (plus, the page did not load correctly) OmniWeb 5.0.1 - NOT vulnerable MSIE 5.2.3 - NOT vulnerable (does not have tabbed browsing) Interesting, how the bug crept into the Netscape/Mozilla codebase after 7.0.2 and has remained there ever since. Cheers, J. Courcoul On Thursday, August 26, 2004, at 05:32PM, <john.courcoul@mac.com> wrote:
Didn't think I'd ever get the chance to report some form of vulnerability, but I did. Minor, granted, but a bug nonetheless. Use the latest browser from Netscape, Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2, set up for tabbed browsing, on a MacOS X 10.3.5 platform with all the latest patches. Open Andy Cuff's "radar" page in the first tab: it sets up two scrolling displays (Security News and Vulnerabilities) on the left side of the window and a date ticker in the middle, under "Operational Picture". Open a new tab, which should be completely independent and allow you to browse another site without interference. Not a chance: the scrolling displays and the date ticker promptly highjack the new pane and display their info on it, on top of any page you should happen to load there. And the scrollers are "live" in whatever tab they have highjacked: click on any of the items they are displaying, and the corresponding page gets loaded on the highjacked tab, NOT on the original "radar" tab. Only until you close the "radar" tab do the scrollers and ticker go away in all other tabs. Works the other way around too: create a bunch of tabs and load all sorts of different sites on them. On the very last tab, open Andy's page. It promptly takes over all tabs and splashes the scrollers and ticker all over the place. In this case, just a nuisance, but might conceivably be misused. Since this information is placed on top of the highjacked tabs, and will cause a new page to load on that tab, a carefully crafted scroller or ticker could misdirect a user trying to do banking on a tab to be redirected to a hostile server elsewhere (i.e., carefully place the scroller on top of the "submit" button, tell the user that the operation failed and get them to retype their private info.) Could this be classified as "phishing" ? J. Courcoul Andy Cuff wrote:Hi All, As a great believer in being able to track emerging vulnerabilities with minimal effort, I have created another "Alert State" image. http://securitywizardry.com/radar.htm However, I have tried to make it a lot more granular dividing the image up into OS and Applications and reducing the alert states to just 3. At present I'm tracking the vulnerabilities myself, though I'm hoping some kind hearted vulnerability alert service such as one of these http://securitywizardry.com/alert.htm will offer to notify me when significant vulnerabilities occur that may warrant a change in an enterprises CND posture. I hope you find it of use, enjoy! Advice, criticism, bitchin' etc welcomed as always -andy cuff Talisker's Computer Security Portal Computer Network Defence Ltd http://www.securitywizardry.com______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 0day critical vulnerability/exploit targets Winamp users in the wild, K-OTiK Security |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | CuteNews News.txt writable to world, e0r |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Netscape Navigator 7.2 failure to isolate browser tabs (was Re: Computer Network Defence Vulnerability Alert State), Rishi Khan |
| Next by Thread: | [security bulletin] SSRT4779 - rev.0 HP-UX Netscape NSS Library Suite SSLv2 remote buffer overflow, Boren, Rich (SSRT) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |