Ethical Hacking

Learn to find vulnerabilities before the bad guys do! Gain real world hands on hacking experience in our state of the art hacking lab. Course designed and taught by expert instructors with years of penetration testing experience. 12 student maximum in every class. Certification attempt included in every package.
Computer Forensics Training at InfoSec Institute

Gain the in-demand skills of a certified computer examiner, learn to recover trace data left behind by fraud, theft, and cybercrime perpetrators. Discover the source of computer crime and abuse at your organization so that it never happens again. All of our class sizes are guaranteed to be 12 students or less to facilitate one-on-one interaction with one of our expert instructors.




Network Security Bugtraq
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Netscape Navigator 7.2 failure to isolate browser tabs (was Re: Com

Subject: Re: Netscape Navigator 7.2 failure to isolate browser tabs (was Re: Computer Network Defence Vulnerability Alert State)
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 01:58:08 -0500
Might as well try and be useful with this and see what other Mac browsers get 
bitten by this bug. Do note that all my tests have been done on MacOS X 10.3.5, 
with the latest Java 1.4.2 Update 1 and Developer packages installed.

Netscape Navigator 7.2  -  Vulnerable (subject of the original mail)
Netscape Navigator 7.1  -  Vulnerable (buggy here too)
Netscape Navigator 7.0.2 -  NOT vulnerable (Amazing ! Ain't we supposed to be 
improving over time ?)

Mozilla 1.7.2                   -  Vulnerable (figures; Navigator 7.2 is based 
on this)
Firefox 0.9.3                   -  Vulnerable (Mozilla's kid brother, limps 
from same foot...)
Camino 0.8.1                    -  NOT vulnerable (some residue might appear on 
the next tab, but applet is inoperative)

Opera 7.5.4                     -  NOT vulnerable (does not have tabbed 
browsing)
iCab 2.9.8                              -  NOT vulnerable (plus, the page did 
not load correctly)
OmniWeb 5.0.1                   -  NOT vulnerable
MSIE 5.2.3                              -  NOT vulnerable (does not have tabbed 
browsing)

Interesting, how the bug crept into the Netscape/Mozilla codebase after 7.0.2 
and has remained there ever since. 

Cheers,

J. Courcoul

On Thursday, August 26, 2004, at 05:32PM, <john.courcoul@mac.com> wrote:

Didn't think I'd ever get the chance to report some form of vulnerability,  
but I did. Minor, granted, but a bug nonetheless.

Use the latest browser from Netscape, Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2, set up for 
tabbed browsing, on a MacOS X 10.3.5 platform with all the latest patches. 
Open Andy Cuff's "radar" page in the first tab: it sets up two scrolling 
displays (Security News and Vulnerabilities) on the left side of the window 
and a date ticker in the middle, under  "Operational Picture". Open a new tab, 
which should be completely independent and allow you to browse another site 
without interference. Not a chance: the scrolling displays and the date ticker 
promptly highjack the new pane and display their info on it, on top of any 
page you should happen to load there. And the scrollers are "live" in whatever 
tab they have highjacked: click on any of the items they are displaying, and 
the corresponding page gets loaded on the highjacked tab, NOT on the original 
"radar" tab. Only until you close the "radar" tab do the scrollers and ticker 
go away in all other tabs.

Works the other way around too: create a bunch of tabs and load all sorts of 
different sites on them. On the very last tab, open Andy's page. It promptly 
takes over all tabs and splashes the scrollers and ticker all over the place.

In this case, just a nuisance, but might conceivably be misused. Since this 
information is placed on top of the highjacked tabs,  and will cause a new 
page to load on that tab, a carefully crafted scroller or ticker could 
misdirect a user trying to do banking on a tab to be redirected to a hostile 
server elsewhere (i.e., carefully place the scroller on top of the "submit" 
button, tell the user that the operation failed and get them to retype their 
private info.)

Could this be classified as "phishing" ?

J. Courcoul

Andy Cuff wrote:

Hi All,
As a great believer in being able to track emerging vulnerabilities with
minimal effort, I have created another "Alert State" image.
http://securitywizardry.com/radar.htm  However, I have tried to make it a
lot more granular dividing the image up into OS and Applications and
reducing the alert states to just 3. At present I'm tracking the
vulnerabilities myself, though I'm hoping some kind hearted vulnerability
alert service such as one of these http://securitywizardry.com/alert.htm
will offer to notify me when significant vulnerabilities occur that may
warrant a change in an enterprises CND posture. I hope you find it of use,
enjoy!

Advice, criticism, bitchin' etc welcomed as always

-andy cuff
Talisker's Computer Security Portal
Computer Network Defence Ltd
http://www.securitywizardry.com



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>